Campus Corner
Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, Sustain
Health care in the U.S. faces many ongoing challenges. Health care
costs continue to climb, even faster than the inflation rate. In the
current recession, many laid-off workers have lost access to
employer-sponsored health insurance. Among those with coverage, many
face higher co-pays and/or diminished protection by insurance plans
that are trying to contain the costs of care. Underlying expenses
contributing to the spiral include:
· research and development costs incurred to introduce new or improve
existing medical technology and prescription drugs
· higher litigation risks that lead to steep malpractice insurance
premiums for health care providers
· inadequate numbers of primary care physicians and geriatricians
capable of caring for an increasingly older, sicker population
· the need to pay competitive wages to attract qualified doctors,
nurses, technicians and other health care personnel
· inefficient or inadequate billing, information technology, lab test,
scheduling and other support services that are necessary to deliver
quality care
· overhead costs required to modernize hospital facilities that are
often 20-30 years old
· facility costs incurred to build new or replacement structures that
can serve the aging cohort of baby boomers
· higher financial burdens borne by public and mental health
institutions and by hospital emergency rooms due to increased numbers
of uninsured patients and due to decreased government funding at the
federal, state, and local levels and
· sudden suspension or even reversal of private endowments resulting
from the repercussions of the Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme and other
financial scandals.
Some of these expenses are beyond the purview of operations management
but operations can contribute to cost reduction by forming a rapid
improvement team to reduce waste and improve quality. A 5S program
(sort, set in order, shine, standardize, sustain) is a useful initial
activity for a rapid improvement team to engage in. The organization
and cleaning of workspaces, the goal of a 5S program, result in
clearly visible, quick improvements that can lead to additional
efficiency gains. The 5S program consists of:
· Sort - red-tagging and removing any products or equipment that are
no longer used. Red-tagged items can be sold, given to another part of
an organization, or discarded.
· Set in Order - labeling remaining items (perhaps with pictures,
terms, or even color-coding) so that they are easy to locate and
store; arranging these items so that they are easy to use and require
minimal transport time. The use of open shelving, a shadow board with
outlines of designated implements showing where they should be stored,
as well as floor outlines to mark clearly the correct locations for
stored equipment will make instruments, tools, and machinery readily
visible and less likely to be forgotten than items stored in closed
cabinets. Floor outlines can also readily reveal shortages or excess
inventories.
· Shine - cleaning floors, shelves, counters, and equipment and
maintaining machinery often so that it is available when needed. The
most critical equipment should be fixed and serviced first. Facility
cleaning should become a daily activity.
· Standardize - the method used to continue sorting, setting in order,
and shining on a regular basis. By documenting the standard way these
three activities are carried out, the efficiencies gained from the
initial sort, set in order, and shine can be easily transferred to
later improvements by reducing the time needed for learning or
relearning.
· Sustain - adopting the habit of regularly maintaining the
standardized methods.
By following the 5S steps, an organization can reduce or eliminate
excess inventory costs, effort expended to repeatedly rearrange excess
inventory, inventory obsolescence, defects or damage to aging
inventory, unneeded transport of items, and equipment failures due to
hindering dirt and debris. Reducing or getting rid of these wastes
sets the foundation for additional process improvements and cost
cutting. An organized, tidy, and clean facility will be more
productive, lead to fewer defects and mistakes, enable better
adherence to schedules and deadlines, and provide a safer environment
for customers and employees. These outcomes will reduce expenditures
and improve quality, and at least slow down the spiral of escalating
health care costs.
by Laura B. Forker, Ph.D., C.P.M.
Professor, Operations Management
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth |
| When continuous improvement and product/service
innovation are paramount for competitive survival, what should a
company measure? Financial measures such as return on investment and
earnings per share? Or operational measures such as cycle time and
defect rates? No individual performance measure can capture all
critical areas of a business. Both financial and operational measures
are needed to provide a comprehensive picture of an organization.
Read the complete December article here. |
|
Fail Safe Your Products and Processes
What do the seat belt light, temperature gauge, check engine light,
low oil pressure light, and gas cap tether have in common? They are
all applications of poka-yoke – a mistake-proofing or fail-safing
mechanism designed to prevent a mistake from being made or to make a
mistake that’s been made to be evident to the operator. First
devised by Shigeo Shingo, an industrial engineer at Toyota in Japan,
poka-yoke has been applied to many goods and services in both the
industrial and consumer sectors of the economy. Shingo observed:
“Defects arise because errors are made; the two have a
cause-and-effect relationship…Yet errors will not turn into defects
if feedback and action take place at the error stage” (Shingo, 1986,
p. 82). Instead of separating defective and acceptable products
(“inspecting in quality”) or using data gathered from inspection to
control a process (traditional statistical process control), Shingo
advocated successive inspections where the closest downstream
operation checks the work of the previous operation. Every operator
examines both value-adding tasks and quality so that the time and
cost of review are minimized. When inspection is nearly costless,
every item can be checked. If work-in-process inventories are low,
process improvement can proceed quickly since quality is
continuously reviewed and corrected.
Read
the complete November article here |
|
Turning Around a Service Failure: The Art of Service Recovery
A recent article in The Archives of Internal Medicine reminded me of
the importance of service recovery and how little attention many
service providers pay to it. The article reports the results of a
survey of 2,600 doctors in the U.S. and Canada that asked how they
would handle serious medical errors in four hypothetical cases. Only
42% of responding physicians would actually admit to making an
“error”; another 56% would inform their patient of the detrimental
incident but not admit to their mistake. Even fewer physicians would
directly apologize to patients for their blunder (only 33%). These
results indicate that few doctors engage in service recovery.
Read the complete October article here.
|
|
Lean Manufacturing: Is it Applicable to Services?
Toyota has steadily gained market share in the U.S. having eclipsed
Chrysler in 2005, pioneer automaker Ford in 2007, and is closing in
on General Motors as American consumers turn away from the products
of the once dominant auto manufacturers and turn to foreign
competitors, especially Toyota. The quality (especially reliability)
of Toyota's automobiles, trucks, and SUVs, which surpassed that of
their American rivals from the 1980s and beyond, has been a major
reason. What is the secret of their success?
Read
the complete September article here.
|
|